tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7879107.post114589611789810937..comments2023-12-08T01:42:31.590-06:00Comments on Cauvin: Poor Definition of "Requirement"Roger L. Cauvinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08969779835314260680noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7879107.post-39707543014003512082011-03-14T12:25:48.933-05:002011-03-14T12:25:48.933-05:00Thanks, Steve. Your "On Reqs and Specs"...Thanks, Steve. Your "On Reqs and Specs" is highly recommended, and I think it hits the nail on the head. It's nice that one of the most respected authorities in the product management community has drawn attention to this issue.Roger L. Cauvinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08969779835314260680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7879107.post-21292830312144114802011-03-14T11:14:19.289-05:002011-03-14T11:14:19.289-05:00Agreed. A good requirement is a statement of the p...Agreed. A good requirement is a statement of the problem, that can be solved, and absent a design of how to solve it.<br /><br />See my article "On Reqs and Specs" for more. http://www.pragmaticmarketing.com/publications/topics/09/on-reqs-and-specs/Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12580476890121296151noreply@blogger.com