tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7879107.post8679762351354185189..comments2023-12-08T01:42:31.590-06:00Comments on Cauvin: iWhat?Roger L. Cauvinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08969779835314260680noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7879107.post-64296130598687556002007-01-16T16:20:00.000-06:002007-01-16T16:20:00.000-06:00I tend to agree with the sentiment. iPod was a lit...I tend to agree with the sentiment. iPod was a little different due to the word Pod. It made a variation on what we expected, so was initially appealing to our curiosity. <br /><br />iPhone, xTreme, eNewsletter, zDrive = dull<br /><br />iTalk = better, but still too dull.<br /><br />iOrb = better, but not the right word.<br /><br />You get the idea. Naming of a device is the opportunity to connect with, and excite your audience. Apple is better than this, and iPhone is a name that MS would have presented (because I'm sure phone.net won't take off).Typhoonandrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12392786022524518082noreply@blogger.com