Skip to main content

Mike Lunt on "Selling" to the Development Team

My friend, Mike Lunt, writes:

There are many jobs that a product manager may do, and while most focus the vast majority of their time gathering requirements and selling the products to the sales team, I contend that another equally important role is necessary. This role involves selling the engineering team on the value the new features or changes in the product will have for the customer (and ultimately the success of the group). In other words, for a product to be successful, the engineering team must be motivated to implement the product manager’s feedback. Many projects have failed or been plagued by engineering feature creep because the team did not have confidence in the information stream coming from the product manager(s).
A product manager's responsibility is to help the entire product team fully understand and appreciate the needs of the customer. This responsibility underscores the product manager's facilitative role. The most effective product managers facilitate not just customers, but sales, marcom, and developers.

Mike goes on to propose some ways that a product manager can use objective data to persuade developers. While objective data is helpful, I think fundamental facilitation techniques - active listening, the Socratic method, etc. - are what's most important.

Comments

Mike Lunt said…
Roger, I agree that facilitation should make up the bulk of the information flow; however, it would also help to show which customers caused the basis for existing features. Instead of using customer A and customer B, engineers often want to have some basis for the features being proposed, especially when prioritzation occurs. For instance, the question about why certain features are being proposed in front of other features seems like a good place to implement some objective data. Maybe a good post on the negative effects of showing objective data might help sway me.
Roger L. Cauvin said…
Mike, I don't dispute that objective data can be helpful. So I don't feel compelled to produce examples of negative effects of objective data.

I do think, however, that the emphasis should not be on features, but on problems that customers are trying to solve. Go here for details.
Mike Lunt said…
Yes, talking about a customer's problems helps the team synergize a solution. I'm glad to hear that adding objective data can be helpful, and in this case, it seems like it would be good to identify which customers are having the particular problems being discussed. My point is I rarely see this kind of objective customer data along with the problems or features being proposed, and it is a good opportunity for the product manager to build additional credibility with the engineering team, especially when the prioritization occurs.

Popular posts from this blog

Why Spreadsheets Suck for Prioritizing

The Goal As a company executive, you want confidence that your product team (which includes all the people, from all departments, responsible for product success) has a sound basis for deciding which items are on the product roadmap. You also want confidence the team is prioritizing the items in a smart way. What Should We Prioritize? The items the team prioritizes could be features, user stories, epics, market problems, themes, or experiments. Melissa Perri  makes an excellent case for a " problem roadmap ", and, in general, I recommend focusing on the latter types of items. However, the topic of what types of items you should prioritize - and in what situations - is interesting and important but beyond the scope of this blog entry. A Sad but Familiar Story If there is significant controversy about priorities, then almost inevitably, a product manager or other member of the team decides to put together The Spreadsheet. I've done it. Some of the mos

Stop Validating and Start Falsifying

The product management and startup worlds are buzzing about the importance of "validation". In this entry, I'll explain how this idea originated and why it's leading organizations astray. Why Validate? In lean startup circles, you constantly hear about "validated learning" and "validating" product ideas: The assumption is that you have a great product idea and seek validation from customers before expending vast resources to build and bring it to market. Indeed, it makes sense to transcend conventional approaches to making product decisions . Intuition, sales anecdotes, feature requests from customers, backward industry thinking, and spreadsheets don't form the basis for sound product decisions. Incorporating lean startup concepts , and a more scientific approach to learning markets, is undoubtedly a sounder approach. Moreover, in larger organizations, sometimes further in the product life-cycle, everyone seems to have an opinio

What Product Managers Can Learn from the Apple iPod

The Story When Apple unveiled its iPod digital music player back in October 2001, I dismissed it as a  parity product . I already owned the Cowon iAUDIO CW100 MP3 player, loaded with my favorite tunes. There was Apple, generating great hype over the iPod as if it were a breakthrough product. The idea of a portable digital music player was nothing new. The first mass-produced MP3 players came out in 1998. In late 2001, the concept may have been new to a lot of Apple customers, but it wasn't new to me. I proudly showed my MP3 player to friends when they gushed about the iPod. Thus Apple's iPod was not an innovative product in and of itself. Years later, however, I realized the significance of ecosystem of which the iPod was a part. Apple had released iTunes (with technology purchased from  SoundJam MP ) and created the iTunes Store for finding and downloading music. Unlike Napster , it was a safe and legal way of distributing and acquiring music. The prior way of playing