Skip to main content

Alyssa Dver on Great Product Managers

Alyssa Dver tells us what distinguishes a great product manager from a good one. Great product managers:

1. Know their product but also know their own limits.
2. Listen first.
3. Ask why, not what.
4. Are decisive.
5. Are responsive.
6. Communicate frequently, concretely, and concisely.
7. Manage passion.

For details, read the rest of Dver's piece.

Comments

Alyssa @ CPLC said…
Roger - thanks for the post on my article. I thought I would mention that I have delivered that content in presentation form a lot - recently at the Software Marketing Conference and prior to that via webinar with the FeaturePlan group. Anyone intersted can listen to the archive of that webinar at: http://www.featureplan.com/elqNow/elqRedir.htm?ref=http://www.featureplan.com/forms/Requirement_management_07_03_14_dver/Requirement_management_07_03_14_dver.mp3

There is the same presentation also archived on the Boston Product Manager's Association website. I delivered it to that group in April.

I am also presenting (a similar but more performance measurement view) at the AIPMM confernece in Tahoe next week - anyone interested in coming - contact me for info on how to save $300! Obviously hurry though - the conference starts next Wed.

I hope its OK, too, that if anyone is intersted in more of this type of content, they might be interested in my book, "Software Product Management Essentials". I just did a major update in honor of the 4th anniversary printing and with teh 10,000th book sold back in Nov 06. The book can be bought on Amazon or B&N.com but if you order from my website, you get free access to the online templates ($17.95 value). The website is: www.swproductmanagement.com.

Thanks again for your post! All the best, Alyssa Dver; info@swproductmanagement.com

Popular posts from this blog

Why Spreadsheets Suck for Prioritizing

The Goal As a company executive, you want confidence that your product team (which includes all the people, from all departments, responsible for product success) has a sound basis for deciding which items are on the product roadmap. You also want confidence the team is prioritizing the items in a smart way. What Should We Prioritize? The items the team prioritizes could be features, user stories, epics, market problems, themes, or experiments. Melissa Perri  makes an excellent case for a " problem roadmap ", and, in general, I recommend focusing on the latter types of items. However, the topic of what types of items you should prioritize - and in what situations - is interesting and important but beyond the scope of this blog entry. A Sad but Familiar Story If there is significant controversy about priorities, then almost inevitably, a product manager or other member of the team decides to put together The Spreadsheet. I've done it. Some of the mos

Use Case as a Black Box

Consider the following use case: Purchase Items Actor: Purchaser Precondition: Purchaser types at least thirty words per minute and has a web navigation efficiency rating of at least 40. Postcondition: For the average Purchaser acting at full efficiency, the number of seconds elapsed is no more than 30 + 20 * n, where n is the number of items purchased. The name of the use case represents a functional requirement. What does the product do, or enable the user to do? Purchase items. What are we to make of the preconditions and postconditions? What relationship do they have to the requirements for the product? Answer: the preconditions and postconditions are the nonfunctional requirements attached to the functional requirement . Another way of expressing the nonfunctional requirement would be as an attribute and associated constraint: Usability: For a Purchaser who types at least thirty words per minute and has a web navigation efficiency rating of at least 40, it shall take no

Henry Ford's "Faster Horse" Quote

You may have heard the ( apocryphal ) Henry Ford quote: If I'd asked customers what they wanted, they would have said "a faster horse". Over at the On Product Management blog , Saeed gives his take on this infamous quote. He "hates" it, and gives some compelling reasons. Saeed is spot on in his explanations. Personally, I think the quote is great, but it's a matter of interpretation. The valid point of the quote is not that it's a bad idea to facilitate a conversation with your market to better understand it. The valid points are: You must ask the right questions to get valuable answers. You must interpret the answers thoughtfully - often outside their direct meaning - to glean reliable information. Asking questions is not always the best way to "listen" to your market. (E.g., sometimes pure observational studies are more reliable.) Nonetheless, I find the quote is helpful to combat "armchair product management" in the