Skip to main content

Cingular 8525 Received

Over the weekend, I finally received my Cingular 8525 (a.k.a. HTC Hermes) mobile phone. Here are some observations:
  1. Navigating the phone with the touch screen is fast and easy. (The exception is the camera; I am still learning its touch screen interface.)
  2. The touch screen dialing is convenient and straightforward now that I'm getting over my expectation of a separate numeric keypad.
  3. Synchronizing contact, calendar, e-mail, and tasks with Outlook took me a long time to get working properly, almost exclusively due to problems with Microsoft's ActiveSync software.
  4. The SMS synchronization software I installed works beautifully. Now copies of all of the text messages I send and receive automatically are stored in Outlook on my computer.
  5. The speakerphone is clear and sufficiently loud.
  6. The slide-out QWERTY keyboard is very handy for typing out text messages, e-mails, and Word/Excel documents.
  7. Wi-fi initially seemed to work well, but now it seems flaky, and configuring it is a bit confusing.
Overall, I'm very happy with my purchase.

Comments

Chip said…
Do you know what the upgrades over the HTC Apache 6700 are? That's what I have and it looks very similar, but I couldn't tell what's different (other than Cingular support). Do you miss the tactile number pad at all? Of all the iPhone hype, I think that is the biggest risk-- that people aren't ready for touch screens (i.e. being unable to dial without looking).
rcauvin said…
The main differences seem to be:

1. 3G data speeds
2. 2.0 megapixel camera
3. Quad-band

I like the touch screen dialing and don't miss the tactile numeric pad. However, I didn't really make much use of the tactile aspects of the dialing experience in the past. (I almost always looked at the keypad while I was dialing.) I may be atypical.

Popular posts from this blog

Why Spreadsheets Suck for Prioritizing

The Goal As a company executive, you want confidence that your product team (which includes all the people, from all departments, responsible for product success) has a sound basis for deciding which items are on the product roadmap. You also want confidence the team is prioritizing the items in a smart way. What Should We Prioritize? The items the team prioritizes could be features, user stories, epics, market problems, themes, or experiments. Melissa Perri  makes an excellent case for a " problem roadmap ", and, in general, I recommend focusing on the latter types of items. However, the topic of what types of items you should prioritize - and in what situations - is interesting and important but beyond the scope of this blog entry. A Sad but Familiar Story If there is significant controversy about priorities, then almost inevitably, a product manager or other member of the team decides to put together The Spreadsheet. I've done it. Some of the mos

Stop Validating and Start Falsifying

The product management and startup worlds are buzzing about the importance of "validation". In this entry, I'll explain how this idea originated and why it's leading organizations astray. Why Validate? In lean startup circles, you constantly hear about "validated learning" and "validating" product ideas: The assumption is that you have a great product idea and seek validation from customers before expending vast resources to build and bring it to market. Indeed, it makes sense to transcend conventional approaches to making product decisions . Intuition, sales anecdotes, feature requests from customers, backward industry thinking, and spreadsheets don't form the basis for sound product decisions. Incorporating lean startup concepts , and a more scientific approach to learning markets, is undoubtedly a sounder approach. Moreover, in larger organizations, sometimes further in the product life-cycle, everyone seems to have an opinio

What Product Managers Can Learn from the Apple iPod

The Story When Apple unveiled its iPod digital music player back in October 2001, I dismissed it as a  parity product . I already owned the Cowon iAUDIO CW100 MP3 player, loaded with my favorite tunes. There was Apple, generating great hype over the iPod as if it were a breakthrough product. The idea of a portable digital music player was nothing new. The first mass-produced MP3 players came out in 1998. In late 2001, the concept may have been new to a lot of Apple customers, but it wasn't new to me. I proudly showed my MP3 player to friends when they gushed about the iPod. Thus Apple's iPod was not an innovative product in and of itself. Years later, however, I realized the significance of ecosystem of which the iPod was a part. Apple had released iTunes (with technology purchased from  SoundJam MP ) and created the iTunes Store for finding and downloading music. Unlike Napster , it was a safe and legal way of distributing and acquiring music. The prior way of playing