Karl Wiegers, author of several books on product requirements, says his favorite definition of requirement is:
Frequent readers of this blog know that I find this definition to be overly broad. After all "a specification of what should be implemented" could include a detailed design specification with UML class and collaboration diagrams. Wieger's favorite definition thus fails to provide any meaningful distinction between requirements and design.
A proper definition of requirement must clearly distinguish between requirements and design.
"Requirements are…a specification of what should be implemented. They are descriptions of how the system should behave, or of a system property or attribute. They may be a constraint on the development process of the system."This unfortunate definition comes from Ian Sommerville and Pete Sawyer.
Frequent readers of this blog know that I find this definition to be overly broad. After all "a specification of what should be implemented" could include a detailed design specification with UML class and collaboration diagrams. Wieger's favorite definition thus fails to provide any meaningful distinction between requirements and design.
A proper definition of requirement must clearly distinguish between requirements and design.
Comments
See my article "On Reqs and Specs" for more. http://www.pragmaticmarketing.com/publications/topics/09/on-reqs-and-specs/