Skip to main content

False Comfort in Measurability

Seth Godin wrote:
The danger is when you keep score of the wrong thing because it's easy or precise.
The requirements for our products should be testable and measurable. When a prospective customer tells us the competitor's product is not secure enough and needs registration and log-in functionality, part of understanding what the prospective customer means is to determine how to measure security.

Your product manager may opt for specifications that are less challenging to measure. Rather than specify security metrics, for example, she may instead punt and simply specify the product will include registration and log-in functionality as the prospective customer requested. But doing so doesn't capture the problem the prospective customer is really trying to solve. What does it mean for the product to be secure?
  • What information is problematic for an unauthorized user to access?
  • What functionality is dangerous for an unauthorized user to employ?
  • What are the characteristics of an authorized user?
These questions are not easy to answer in measurable terms. There's precision in specifying that the product will require user registration and log-in, but it doesn't answer these questions. Yet answering these questions is critical to understanding the customer's needs and to ultimately testing whether your product satisfies them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Spreadsheets Suck for Prioritizing

The Goal As a company executive, you want confidence that your product team (which includes all the people, from all departments, responsible for product success) has a sound basis for deciding which items are on the product roadmap. You also want confidence the team is prioritizing the items in a smart way. What Should We Prioritize? The items the team prioritizes could be features, user stories, epics, market problems, themes, or experiments. Melissa Perri  makes an excellent case for a " problem roadmap ", and, in general, I recommend focusing on the latter types of items. However, the topic of what types of items you should prioritize - and in what situations - is interesting and important but beyond the scope of this blog entry. A Sad but Familiar Story If there is significant controversy about priorities, then almost inevitably, a product manager or other member of the team decides to put together The Spreadsheet. I've done it. Some of the mos

Interaction Design: the Neglected Skill

Your product development organization has a big, gaping hole in it. (Be prepared to feel defensive as you continue reading.) One of the most important roles in product development is the role of interaction designer. An interaction designer designs how the users will interact with the product and conceptualize the tasks they perform. He decides whether, for example, the user interface will be command driven, object oriented (clicking on objects then specifying what to do with them), or wizard based. The interaction designer decides the individual steps in the use cases. Every company has one or more people that play the interaction designer role. Usually, those people have little or no expertise in interaction design. Sadly, they typically don't even realize how unqualified they are. Let's see who typically plays the role at companies. Engineer . An engineer is an expert on building what is designed. Yes, an engineer may know how to design the internal structure of the hardware

Stop Validating and Start Falsifying

The product management and startup worlds are buzzing about the importance of "validation". In this entry, I'll explain how this idea originated and why it's leading organizations astray. Why Validate? In lean startup circles, you constantly hear about "validated learning" and "validating" product ideas: The assumption is that you have a great product idea and seek validation from customers before expending vast resources to build and bring it to market. Indeed, it makes sense to transcend conventional approaches to making product decisions . Intuition, sales anecdotes, feature requests from customers, backward industry thinking, and spreadsheets don't form the basis for sound product decisions. Incorporating lean startup concepts , and a more scientific approach to learning markets, is undoubtedly a sounder approach. Moreover, in larger organizations, sometimes further in the product life-cycle, everyone seems to have an opinio